Log in

Radical Translations

  • Date
  • False: false attribution such as false place of imprint or false date
  • Fictional place: false imprint contains a fictional, invented place of imprint or date
  • Form: type or genre of writing.
  • Female
  • Male
  • Language
  • Noble: person was born noble.
  • Place
  • Role: the main role of a person or organization in relation to a resource.
  • Subject: content, theme, or topic of a work.
  • Uncertainty: information could not be verified.

The confessions of J.J. Rousseau, citizen of Geneva. To which are added the Reveries of a solitary walker and a new collection of letters from the author. Translated from the French

Authors of source text

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Contributions

uncertainty Anonymous (William Combe)
translator
G.G.J. and J. Robinson (George Robinson)
publisher

Related resources

is translation of
Les Rêveries du promeneur solitaire has translation
is translation of
Les Confessions has translation
is translation of
Lettres de J.J. Rousseau has translation
has paratext
The confessions of J.J. Rousseau, citizen of Geneva. To which are added the Reveries of a solitary walker and a new collection of letters from the author. Translated from the French paratext

Held by

Notes

Two parts, three volumes. An earlier translation of the first six books of the Confessions, followed by the Reveries, was published by Bew in 1783 (probably based on Les Confessions de J.J. Rousseau, suivies des Rêveries du promeneur solitaire, Geneva, 1782). The remaining six book appeared in French in 1789. For the present edition, the same first six books and the Reveries were retranslated. Added to that was a collection of letters (based on Moultou's edition of 1789?) in three volumes. The latter are accompanied by translator's preface. Barbier has argued that the anonymous translation is the work of William Combe. See C.P. Barbier, 'Letters of an Italian nun and an English gentleman', Revue de Littérature Comparée, vol. 28 (Jan 1, 1954). Review in Analytical Review, vol. IX (1791), p. 579, heavily critical of the work.